7 Critical VAT Traps OTAs in Indonesia Must Avoid to Stay Compliant

Introduction

Online Travel Agencies, or OTAs, have revolutionized the way people book accommodations, tours, and experiences. With just a few clicks, travelers can compare hundreds of listings and finalize their bookings instantly. However, this convenience also brings complexity—especially in terms of taxation and compliance in destination countries like Indonesia.

In recent years, foreign and local OTAs in Indonesia have come under closer scrutiny due to changing tax regulations. As more transactions take place online—often across borders—the Indonesian government is tightening its oversight on digital business activities, including the hospitality and tourism sector. For OTAs operating within the country or targeting Indonesian consumers, understanding VAT (Value-Added Tax) obligations has become more important than ever.

The digital tax landscape in Indonesia has evolved significantly since 2020. New rules and mechanisms are being introduced to ensure that both domestic and foreign digital platforms contribute fairly to the national revenue. This shift is part of the government’s initiative to regulate OTAs in Indonesia and ensure tax parity between traditional and digital service providers.

As enforcement continues to strengthen, non-compliance can lead to serious financial and reputational risks for OTAs.

What is an OTA and How Do They Operate in Indonesia?

Online Travel Agencies (OTAs) are digital platforms that connect travelers with accommodation providers, tour operators, and other tourism-related services. In Indonesia, popular OTAs include international names like Booking.com and Airbnb, as well as local giants such as Traveloka, Tiket.com, and Pegipegi. These platforms simplify the booking process and offer competitive prices by aggregating listings, providing user reviews, and handling secure transactions.

The business model for OTAs in Indonesia typically involves earning revenue through service fees and commissions charged to hosts or service providers. Some OTAs also apply cancellation or rescheduling penalties, which can contribute to their overall earnings. The exact revenue mechanism can vary: for example, Airbnb deducts a percentage-based service fee from hosts, while Booking.com charges commission after a completed stay. Traveloka, on the other hand, may apply a combination of service fees and markups, depending on the service offered.

Cross-border transactions are common, especially for foreign and domestic OTAs in Indonesia serving international guests. These transactions pose additional complexity, particularly regarding tax obligations. In some cases, the platform may be based outside Indonesia, while the property or tour being booked is located within the country. This scenario introduces the need for VAT compliance under Indonesia’s "deemed collector" mechanism, which applies to foreign digital service providers.

The growth of OTAs in Indonesia has surged in recent years, driven by increasing internet penetration, digital payment adoption, and a strong post-pandemic rebound in domestic tourism. With millions of bookings happening online each month, OTAs have become a critical driver of Indonesia’s tourism economy.

However, as their influence grows, so does the regulatory attention. The Indonesian government expects both local and foreign OTAs to understand and comply with VAT rules, ensuring not just fair competition, but also proper contribution to national tax revenues.

Deemed Collector Mechanism Explained

In Indonesia’s evolving digital tax landscape, the government introduced the concept of “Pemungut PPN” or VAT Collector status to ensure tax compliance from foreign and local digital platforms. Under this system, certain businesses—including OTAs—may be designated by the Directorate General of Taxes (DJP) as deemed collectors, obligating them to collect, report, and remit Value Added Tax (VAT) from Indonesian consumers.

This applies particularly to foreign digital platforms that do not have a physical presence in Indonesia but generate significant revenue from Indonesian users. For instance, many OTAs in Indonesia have been appointed as deemed collectors, such as Airbnb and Agoda, due to their extensive involvement in Indonesia’s tourism and hospitality sectors.

When OTAs in Indonesia act as pemungut pajak, they are responsible for charging an 11% VAT on the sale of digital goods or services to Indonesian consumers. This VAT is added to the total price paid by the user and must be clearly itemized in the booking or transaction receipt. These platforms must also issue electronic tax invoices (faktur pajak) and remit the VAT collected to the DJP monthly.

This regulation applies even if the underlying accommodation provider or service host is not VAT-registered (PKP). In such cases, the OTA—rather than the host—bears the obligation to collect and remit the tax, which significantly increases the compliance burden for OTAs in Indonesia.

By enforcing this mechanism, the Indonesian government aims to create a level playing field between foreign digital companies and local businesses, many of which are already subject to stringent VAT rules. As more OTAs operate across borders, understanding and complying with these obligations becomes critical to avoiding penalties and maintaining platform credibility in the eyes of both regulators and users.

VAT Withholding: Local vs. Offshore OTAs

The Indonesian tax regime distinguishes between local and offshore OTAs when it comes to VAT withholding obligations, leading to different compliance paths. Local OTAs—those operating as PT or PMA entities—are subject to standard domestic tax rules, while offshore OTAs in Indonesia face different requirements under the Peraturan Menteri Keuangan (PMK) No. 60/2022 and PMSE (Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik) regulations.

Under PMK-60, foreign digital businesses providing services to Indonesian consumers are required to collect and remit 11% VAT if appointed as deemed collectors. In contrast, local OTAs in Indonesia must also register as PKP (Pengusaha Kena Pajak) and are obliged to withhold VAT on payments made to suppliers, issue tax invoices, and submit detailed VAT returns. This adds administrative responsibilities that offshore OTAs may not encounter directly—though they still face scrutiny under PMSE guidelines.

For example, Airbnb operates as a foreign digital platform and is a deemed VAT collector. It charges VAT directly to Indonesian customers without a local tax presence. On the other hand, Tiket.com, a local OTA, must comply with broader obligations including withholding VAT from vendors and suppliers, in addition to collecting it from end users.

Despite these distinctions, some OTAs in Indonesia may underestimate the complexity of withholding rules, particularly when managing cross-border transactions. Missteps can lead to penalties and reputational damage.

Ultimately, understanding the nuanced differences in tax responsibilities is essential to reducing compliance risks for OTAs in Indonesia, especially in a regulatory environment that continues to evolve.

When Must OTAs Collect VAT on Behalf of Hosts?

A critical compliance trigger arises when property or service providers using OTA platforms are not registered as PKP (Pengusaha Kena Pajak). In such cases, many OTAs in Indonesia must now collect VAT directly from end users and remit it to the tax authority on the host's behalf—even though the OTA is technically acting only as a digital intermediary.

Under Indonesia’s evolving tax rules, the OTA is viewed as facilitating a taxable transaction. As a result, regulations affecting OTAs in Indonesia and their hosts impose a legal obligation on the platform to step in and ensure VAT is collected. This is especially relevant for platforms like Airbnb or Booking.com, where thousands of listings are owned by individuals or small operators not registered as PKP.

There’s often uncertainty among OTAs in Indonesia regarding when to withhold, especially if the host's PKP status is unclear or unverified. This ambiguity can increase risk if proper VAT collection is skipped or delayed.

VAT collected must typically be deposited by the 15th of the following month and reported in the monthly SPT Masa PPN. Failing to do so could lead to penalties—even if the platform itself didn’t receive the full amount of the booking transaction.

Non-Registered Hosts: A Grey Area for Compliance

A growing concern for OTAs operating in tourist-heavy regions like Bali and Lombok is the prevalence of non-registered property hosts. Many villa or homestay owners list their accommodations through platforms such as Airbnb or Booking.com without operating under a formal business structure (e.g., PT) or registering as PKP (Taxable Entrepreneurs).

This creates a legal and operational grey area—OTAs in Indonesia are exposed to legal risk when facilitating transactions from hosts who may not be tax-compliant. While the OTA itself may act as a neutral intermediary, under Indonesian tax law, it can be required to step in as a deemed VAT collector for these hosts.

The problem deepens when the host is operating under a personal name, with no tax ID or business license. In such cases, the OTA must decide whether to take on the compliance burden or risk being penalized for failing to withhold and remit VAT.

The lack of clear documentation, combined with inconsistent reporting by informal hosts, means unregistered hosts create tax reporting problems for OTAs in Indonesia. If audited, the OTA could be held liable for uncollected VAT, even if the host received the bulk of the revenue.

Additionally, collecting VAT on behalf of a host who is technically not eligible to charge VAT (due to non-PKP status) presents a legal paradox—highlighting the urgent need for clearer guidelines and stronger communication between platforms and their host communities.

To manage these risks, many OTAs are now strengthening their onboarding processes, requiring proof of tax registration or business licenses before allowing hosts to list properties. However, enforcement remains inconsistent, especially across international platforms with high volumes of new listings.

Cancellation Fees & Service Charges: Are They Taxable?

A common misconception among hospitality operators and platforms is that cancellation fees, rescheduling charges, or non-refundable deposits are not subject to VAT. However, under Indonesian tax law, these types of fees are considered part of the service and are therefore VATable at 11%.

In practice, many OTAs in Indonesia wrongly exclude VAT from such charges, assuming that since the service was not rendered (due to cancellation), it is exempt from taxation. This is not the case. The Directorate General of Taxes (DJP) treats cancellation or no-show penalties as part of the overall service revenue—even if it results from a failed or modified transaction.

Therefore, these types of service fees by OTAs in Indonesia must be included in VAT reporting. OTAs are expected to issue proper tax invoices (faktur pajak) for these transactions and remit the applicable VAT.

To ensure compliance, OTAs should standardize their pricing structure to reflect VAT-inclusive charges, clearly state VAT obligations in their user terms, and maintain accurate documentation—even for partially completed bookings. Failure to do so can result in penalties during tax audits.

Documentation and Reporting Tips for VAT Compliance

For OTAs in Indonesia, accurate reporting is key to staying compliant with VAT regulations. With growing scrutiny from tax authorities, maintaining precise documentation and clear classifications can help platforms avoid costly penalties.

First, issuing valid tax invoices (faktur pajak) is essential. The invoice must include the correct 11% VAT, clearly show whether it’s charged on commissions, cancellation fees, or service revenues, and be issued on time. For local OTAs, this is done through e-Faktur, while some foreign OTAs may use the DJP Online system or submit manually if appointed as deemed collectors.

Another common pitfall is misclassifying revenue. Commissions earned from hosts should be separated from service fees charged to customers. Using inconsistent classifications can result in discrepancies and tax audit red flags for OTAs in Indonesia.

Additionally, many OTAs in Indonesia fail to reconcile monthly revenue with VAT reporting, especially when working with hundreds or thousands of listings. A consistent accounting system and automated VAT calculation tools can minimize these gaps.

Platforms must also consider cross-border transactions. If a foreign OTA facilitates a transaction for an Indonesian property, the service may still be deemed as consumed in Indonesia—and thus taxable. Documenting the “place of consumption” properly helps determine VAT obligations.

Lastly, tax authorities expect quarterly and annual reporting to align with real-time transaction records. OTAs that underreport or omit taxable transactions may be flagged for audits or sanctions.

In short, accurate reporting is key for OTAs in Indonesia to reduce compliance risk, support transparency, and build long-term operational credibility in the digital tourism space.

Conclusion: How OTAs Can Avoid VAT Pitfalls in Indonesia

From VAT obligations on service fees to challenges with unregistered hosts, successful OTAs in Indonesia are those that stay ahead of evolving tax regulations. This article has explored seven critical issues: VAT registration, commission taxability, local vs. offshore treatment, intermediary responsibilities, grey areas with non-PKP hosts, taxability of cancellation fees, and reporting documentation.

As VAT enforcement will only increase for OTAs in Indonesia, platforms must ensure they comply with PMK-60, VAT Law No. 42/2009, and the relevant PMSE regulations. Compliance is not optional for OTAs in Indonesia, especially as authorities grow more sophisticated in auditing digital platforms.

To reduce risk, OTAs should invest in automated reporting systems, maintain valid tax documentation, and seek guidance from local tax consultants who understand the intricacies of Indonesian VAT law. Early action now can prevent bigger issues later.

‍